Aristedes Maniatis <a...@ish.com.au> writes: > I guess I'm just not understanding a fundamental concept in docbook > then. I had always assumed docbook was a pure documentation schema and > not intended to model real world concepts. When I look at
Well. Every now and then, we've been persuaded to do some modeling
in the aid of documentation. The class/method/fieldsynopsis elements
are one example, cmdsynopsis an older example, and everyone's favorite
mistake msgset.
Generally speaking, I think our forays into modeling have
been...disappointing, but that's where we are.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <n...@nwalsh.com> | No man's knowledge here can go
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | beyond his experience.--John Locke
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
