Hi Frank,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:33:51 +0200
Frank Arensmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
> I totally agree with Thomas. As Thomas pointed out, there is an
> industry standard in Europe (maybe in other parts of the world too?)
> saying that you actually must differentiate between hazard
> statements. And danger is used to express a high risk of injury
> and/or death, whereas "caution" is actually something else. We’ve
> been "solving" this kind of issue before by introducing <caution
> role="danger">.
Thanks Frank for pointing it out so much better than I could do. :))
> However, a more "generic" element would feel much better. And Dave...
> no, it’s not about CSS or other styling. It’s actually an element
> something that lots of our clients need.
Thanks Frank for confirming there is a need for that. :-)
--
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
