For the curious, here's what the DITA 1.3 specification allows for the @type attribute on <note> (second subsection on this page):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/attributes/thetypeattribute.html The value "other" allows extensibility in conjunction with another attribute @othertype: http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/os/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/note.html mag -- Tom Magliery JustSystems Canada, Inc. Co-secretary, OASIS DITA Technical Committee DITA 1.3 Specification: http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part0-overview.html -----Original Message----- From: Peter Flynn [mailto:pe...@silmaril.ie] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:56 PM To: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [docbook] Add "danger" to the list of possible admonitions? On 04/28/2016 09:24 AM, Dave Pawson wrote: > What is danger to you might be nothing to me? > I think caution is right or a good compromise. I was never clear why a caution was worse than a warning. <para><command>drop lamp</command></para> <caution role="fatal"> <para>It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.</para> </caution> On 04/28/2016 09:15 AM, Thomas Schraitle wrote: > The element danger would also fit better > to the ANSI standard (I think it was Z535, right?). If there is a need to match with an existing standard/hierarchy/ontology I'd rather see it done in an enumerated attribute than an element type. ///Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
