Hi! On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:22:08PM +0100, allan wrote: > i dont really see a great need for the > "toc"-inline-reference, so i think we should throw that away. > and the "top"-reference really should not be like any other > navigation style as it will always point to the current page > page. While I hardly ever use top-toc links myself, I think they might be useful for some people. Therefor IMO they should be very unobtrusive, like they were in Stas' original design (and in mine, BTW): simple, blue text links (TOC TOP), no fuzz, easy to ignore, but still there if you need them.
> about link colors. no matter what any experts i think > designers should choose any link-color they want as long as > they are cinsistent through the site. i might be we loose a I agree. > > I don't like the idea of using HTML tables to structure a site. Tables are > > good to present tabular data, but (IMO) shouldn't be used for page layout. > while i agree on this point i have never found it pracically > possible to avoid tables. My current sugestion is table-free. The only "problem" is with old browser that don't support CSS properly, but as the page degrades IMO very well, that's no real problem. My suggestion doesn't want to /look/ the same on each browser, but to /be usable/ with each browser, which it is. It probably is not that nicelooking on browser with broken CSS support (like NS 4.x), but there you can turn CSS off. > 2) i am simply too busy during the next couple of weeks (im > moving to vietnam) wow, vietnam? I guess it's warm there, something clearly missing in Vienna at this time. -- D_OMM +----> http://domm.zsi.at <-----+ O_xyderkes | neu: Arbeitsplatz | M_echanen | http://domm.zsi.at/d/d162.html | M_asteuei +--------------------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
