Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> allan wrote:
> > Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>stas        02/02/22 00:24:03
> >>>
> >>>  Modified:    src      style.css
> >>>  Log:
> >>>  - no need for using huge letters and bold weight for the title, it's
> >>>  already standing out by using opposite to the rest of the page colors
> >>>
> >>anybody thinks it's a bad patch? The title in mozilla was simply huge!
> >>
> >
> > please tell us your browser prefs for font-sizes.
> 
> proportional 16px, the rest 12px adobe-* fonts. But it's the 16px that
> makes the fonts big. I suppose that most sites tend to use <font =-1>
> equivalent. :(

what is equivalent to <font =-1>, i dont understand? are you
saying that most other sites looks from ok to good in
mozilla using a certain font-spec?

 
> >>now it's bearable.
> >>
> >
> > before it was a title now its, well ... just text (any
> > browser i test).
> 
> what do you mean just text, what about the box with the contrasting color?

the title doesn't currently look like a title, it just look
like some ordinary text in a box. the contrasting  colour is
there of course.

the breadcrumb and title must share the same font-styles
otherwise it just looks bad seen from a typesetters or
desingers view.

IMO the breadcrumb currently has never been better, so i
think we should make the title-fonts the same properties
(apart from size), meaning bold and verdana.
if you do this you also gain the sub-advantage that the
title-text inside the colured box will look more evenly
padded. at the moment it more or less top-aligned


 
> > my set up:
> > (mac os9, netscape6.2, font-size 14pt, monospace 13pt)
> 
> Not much different from mine

true, but mine doesnt look bad with a 16pt setting ;-)

since thomas complained about this too, are there really
that much difference between mozilla and ns6+ ? i thought
they were more or less the same.

can you post a screenshot of the good and the bad?

./allan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to