Stas Bekman wrote:
allan wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas 02/02/22 00:24:03
Modified: src style.css Log: - no need for using huge letters and bold weight for the title, it's already standing out by using opposite to the rest of the page colors
anybody thinks it's a bad patch? The title in mozilla was simply huge!
please tell us your browser prefs for font-sizes.
proportional 16px, the rest 12px adobe-* fonts. But it's the 16px that makes the fonts big. I suppose that most sites tend to use <font =-1> equivalent. :(
what is equivalent to <font =-1>, i dont understand? are you saying that most other sites looks from ok to good in mozilla using a certain font-spec?
I think so, but I can be wrong.
now it's bearable.
before it was a title now its, well ... just text (any browser i test).
what do you mean just text, what about the box with the contrasting color?
the title doesn't currently look like a title, it just look like some ordinary text in a box. the contrasting colour is there of course.
the breadcrumb and title must share the same font-styles otherwise it just looks bad seen from a typesetters or desingers view.
IMO the breadcrumb currently has never been better, so i think we should make the title-fonts the same properties (apart from size), meaning bold and verdana. if you do this you also gain the sub-advantage that the title-text inside the colured box will look more evenly padded. at the moment it more or less top-aligned
well if you check the change, I didn't change the style:
.headline {
color: #ffffff;
font-family: helvetica, arial, verdana, sans-serif;
- font-size:1.5em;
- font-weight: bold;
+ font-size: 1.2em;
}I simply made it smaller em-wise and removed the bold-ness. Is putting the bold back good enough? You also want verdana to be first?
my set up: (mac os9, netscape6.2, font-size 14pt, monospace 13pt)
Not much different from mine
true, but mine doesnt look bad with a 16pt setting ;-)
but your are on a different platform with a different font set.
since thomas complained about this too, are there really that much difference between mozilla and ns6+ ? i thought they were more or less the same.
can you post a screenshot of the good and the bad?
posting only the 'bad', you can see that it's too big with 1.5em + bold.
BTW, anybody knows what's the definition of H1? Is it 1.2em, 1.4em or bigger?
_____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
<<inline: snap1.png>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
