i should keep quiet but i can't because i feel strongly against these. stas and jonathan,
nice try both of you but i think your images misses one of the points as beeing a logo. stas' image: to me there's no underscore at all - just an underline in two colours. so in that sense its pointless, sorry for sounding harsh :) jonathan's image: i think the underscore resembles the red cross logo just in gray-blue and therefore noisier. one of the very nice things about the winning logo is its "cleanliness" - there's no noise at all, it's well-balanced and the colours /black/gray/blue are perfect on a white background. if you stare at it you won't notice or feel any disturbabces at all - the same cannot be said about your efforts IMO. i have also tried myself but gave up, i think the logo was (or look like it was) designed by a proffesional designer (though i don't know). ./allan Stas Bekman wrote: > > Jonathan M. Hollin wrote: > >>Another possible reason for the logo with the underscore not looking > >>right is the fact that _ is colored the same color as 'mod'. If we > >>colour half of the _ the same color as 'mod' and the other half as > >>'perl' it "may" look much better... just an idea. > > > > > > I've had a go at this. Image attached... > > Thanks Bill! > > looks like I still didn't give up :) doing some more work on Jonathan's > take, see the attachment. > This logo solves the problem of the underscore, it's not there and it's > is there in the same time. What do you think? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
