of the errors:

the units are easily fixed -> probably just "0px" instead of "0".


the warnings. i have told my feelings about this in a mail
ages ago. we should fix it if we want to put that valid logo
on the site, but personally i think it seems rather stupid
to have to assign a background-colour for a p-tag etc.


./allan

Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> We need to squash CSS errors as reported by css-validator:
> http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fperl.apache.org%2Fpreview%2Fmodperl-docs%2Fdst_html%2Fdocs%2F1.0%2Fguide%2Fgetwet.html&warning=1&profile=css2
> 
> any CSS2 expert to help?
> 
> Also another css lint has suggested
> * The shorthand 'background' property is more widely supported than
> 'background-color'
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> __________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to