allan wrote:
of the errors:
the units are easily fixed -> probably just "0px" instead of "0".
fixed:
Congratulations!
Valid CSS!This document validates as CSS!
Congratulations, this document validates as HTML 4.01 Transitional!
the warnings. i have told my feelings about this in a mail
ages ago. we should fix it if we want to put that valid logo
on the site, but personally i think it seems rather stupid
to have to assign a background-colour for a p-tag etc.
we know that have to fix these, I've asked *how* to fix these warnings.
./allan
Stas Bekman wrote:
We need to squash CSS errors as reported by css-validator:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fperl.apache.org%2Fpreview%2Fmodperl-docs%2Fdst_html%2Fdocs%2F1.0%2Fguide%2Fgetwet.html&warning=1&profile=css2
any CSS2 expert to help?
Also another css lint has suggested
* The shorthand 'background' property is more widely supported than
'background-color'
Thanks!
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
