At 18:19 04.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Well, it is 88x31, like you asked. It's too long, that's why it looks > small when compressed to 88 pixels. That's also why I created the other > one, which makes the modperl text bigger.
True. But you lost the cogs in the bigger one. At least I don't see them.
:-) They are both 88x31. However, I removed the cogs in the second one to make the "modperl" text bigger! Should I maybe make a button that is bigger but includes both cogs and text?
>> Hmm, I think it's better if we try to brand the logo and we already have >> 2.5 brands. So I'm -1 on other logos. we can still keep them somewhere. > > > Well, I don't know where else to put them.They are clearly interesting > for historical purposes... But what should I do with these?
tar.gz them all and put them as one file linked from the bottom of the page.
Ok, sure. Good idea.
> Well... Yes I agree that it might be good, but it'll *clearly* be too > wide. Maybe if I make the banners and logo smaller, so that it all fits > somewhat?
How about:
logo | description ------------------ H T M L
but still preserving the layout with HTML tables. so each entry takes 2 rows.
I'm still working on this. The HTML is pretty generic (only filename, width and height changes -- and width and height aren't really needed either), so that can go below the table. I'll probably go with the table, but with thumbnails for the graphics, linked to the bigger one.
-- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
