On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:24:09PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:
> 
> > > Most of the userspace programs from Solaris are close to unmaintained 
> > > these days.
> > > 
> > > If I make bug-fixes and enhancements for Sun software, I try to inform 
> > > people 
> > > about what I did and I give the permission to use it but I don't have the 
> > > time
> > > to run after an "upstream" integration. If Sun is not interested in these 
> > > enhancements, it is a Sun problem.
> >
> > You could at least raise a CR pointing out that there are changes to
> > integrate and where to get them.  Expecting Sun to follow your
> > derivative is too much.
> 
> If generic announcement systems for software updates like 
> sourcewell.berlios.de
> and freshmeat.net are not sufficient, then Sun would need to offer a Sun 
> website to repeat this feature.

I'm not sure I follow.  We were talking about downstream changes that
you are making, not changes that Sun are making.

> It is typically impossible to find the current Sun maintainers for a piece of 
> fostware and the names change freqhently in some areas.

Raising a ticket at bugs.opensolaris.org pushes the onus of merging onto
Sun, I thought that's what you wanted.

Ceri
-- 
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/docs-discuss/attachments/20080123/d36419f9/attachment.bin>

Reply via email to