Hi Ceri and Ben, Here is the project description from the projects page:
Muskoka - The project provides a low-overhead centralized repository for posting or archiving technical content on OpenSolaris.org which does not have a logical home within any existing project or community space. All OpenSolaris contributors are welcome to join in and create their own pages; all that is required is an email request to the discussion list. Is the above better? Ben, when we talked, I described the current state of the project as one that houses content we're not collaborating on. But, that could certainly change in the future and I wouldn't want to limit that possibility in the future. Content project is more like technical articles while Muskoka is more like whitepapers. Not sure if any of this helps, let me know what you think. -Michelle Ceri Davies wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:05:14PM -0800, Ben Rockwood wrote: > >> I think some content needs to be re-written on the Muskoka project page >> (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/muskoka/). Based on my >> discussion with Michelle the title "OpenSolaris Project: Muskoka: An >> open repository for OpenSolaris technical content", and the sole >> description are misleading: "Anyone is welcome to post content here, >> provided it is technical in nature and is relevant to the OpenSolaris >> community. Inquire on muskoka-discuss >> <mailto:muskoka%20dash%20discuss%20at%20opensolaris%20dot%20org>." >> >> Rather the title can stay, but the description on that page should be >> closer too: >> >> "Project Muskoka provides an open archive for non-collaborative >> technical content that is intended for use and review but no longer in >> an evolving state, for any of a variety of reasons. Community members >> possessing such content are encouraged to post it here so that it may >> long endure. For additional information please inquire on >> [muskoka-discuss]." >> > > In plain English, does this mean that is I have, say, a presentation on > resource control that it would be the target type of content? I still > can't really parse the above. > > Ceri > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > docs-discuss mailing list > docs-discuss at opensolaris.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/docs-discuss/attachments/20080130/fb36cb92/attachment.html>
