Would presentations fall into technical content? I'm asking because of a recent thread at the advocacy group where some people talked about a central repository for presentations.
Thanks Rafael Ben Rockwood wrote: > Thats better, I would add an additional line pointing new collaborative > content creation to OS Content. My chief concern is to avoid confusion > between Content and Muskoka which look redundant currently. > > benr. > > > michelle olson wrote: >> Hi Ceri and Ben, >> >> Here is the project description from the projects page: >> >> Muskoka - The project provides a low-overhead centralized repository >> for posting or archiving technical content on OpenSolaris.org which >> does not have a logical home within any existing project or community >> space. All OpenSolaris contributors are welcome to join in and create >> their own pages; all that is required is an email request to the >> discussion list. >> >> Is the above better? Ben, when we talked, I described the current >> state of the project as one that houses content we're not >> collaborating on. But, that could certainly change in the future and I >> wouldn't want to limit that possibility in the future. Content >> project is more like technical articles while Muskoka is more like >> whitepapers. Not sure if any of this helps, let me know what you think. >> >> -Michelle >> >> >> Ceri Davies wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:05:14PM -0800, Ben Rockwood wrote: >>> >>>> I think some content needs to be re-written on the Muskoka project page >>>> (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/muskoka/). Based on my >>>> discussion with Michelle the title "OpenSolaris Project: Muskoka: An >>>> open repository for OpenSolaris technical content", and the sole >>>> description are misleading: "Anyone is welcome to post content here, >>>> provided it is technical in nature and is relevant to the OpenSolaris >>>> community. Inquire on muskoka-discuss >>>> <mailto:muskoka%20dash%20discuss%20at%20opensolaris%20dot%20org>." >>>> >>>> Rather the title can stay, but the description on that page should be >>>> closer too: >>>> >>>> "Project Muskoka provides an open archive for non-collaborative >>>> technical content that is intended for use and review but no longer in >>>> an evolving state, for any of a variety of reasons. Community members >>>> possessing such content are encouraged to post it here so that it may >>>> long endure. For additional information please inquire on >>>> [muskoka-discuss]." >>>> >>> In plain English, does this mean that is I have, say, a presentation on >>> resource control that it would be the target type of content? I still >>> can't really parse the above. >>> >>> Ceri >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> docs-discuss mailing list >>> docs-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> > > _______________________________________________ > docs-discuss mailing list > docs-discuss at opensolaris.org
