http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/vi6/chapter/ch08.html
On 5/8/07, Rainer Heilke <rheilke at dragonhearth.com> wrote: > Really? Wow, I've never heard of this before. I've never really been a > vi guru by any stretch, but this is a real surprise. Sorry, everyone, > and thanks for correcting me, Eric. I never bought the O'Reilly book, as > I never pushed vi hard enough to need it. Between that, and some of the > extensions being undocumented otherwise, it would explain my complete > obliviousness to this. > > I'll have to look into this some. > > Rainer > > Eric Lowe wrote: > > >Solaris vi does have some non-standard extensions, such as a tag stack. Some > >of them are undocumented. The O'Reilly vi book > >(http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/vi6/index.html) has a nice comparison and a > >description of the Solaris-specific features. > > > >- Eric > > > >----- Original Message ---- > >From: Rainer Heilke <rheilke at dragonhearth.com> > >To: Blake <blake.irvin at gmail.com> > >Cc: Richard L. Hamilton <rlhamil at smart.net>; docs-discuss at > >opensolaris.org > >Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2007 10:45:56 PM > >Subject: Re: [docs-discuss] Re: 'cheat sheets' for common administrative > >tasks > > > >The vi that comes with Solaris 10 is the standard, generic vi from Bill > >Joy (the author, I believe). There is nothing Solaris-specific that I > >know of, and that's comparing it to the vi from FreeBSD as well. > > > >You are correct about Linux; the distros/versions I've looked at all > >linked the vi command to vim. It was actually a source of frustration to > >me, as vim does not behave like vi. > > > >Rainer > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > docs-discuss mailing list > docs-discuss at opensolaris.org >
