On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:04:14PM +0530, Pradhap Devarajan wrote:
> Hi Ceri
> dispadmin -u is a private interface which will not be documented I
> guess. http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6392350 .
Ah, well, I'm happy with that, but in this case it should really be
removed from here:
peasant% uname -a
SunOS peasant 5.11 opensol-20070507 i86pc i386 i86pc
peasant% /usr/sbin/dispadmin
usage: dispadmin -l
dispadmin -c class [class-specific options]
dispadmin -d [class]
dispadmin -u
I'll raise a bug with a patch for that; please note that I have other
questions in the second and third paragraphs below if anyone can answer
those.
Thanks for the pointer.
Cheers,
Ceri
> On 5/14/07, Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached a patch to document dispadmin's -u option in the manpage;
> > I don't know if this should be documented as it's intended for internal
> > use by the look of things, but otherwise it should probably be removed
> > from dispadmin's usage() output.
> >
> > In this patch, there's also a sentence fragment towards the top that I
> > removed, although if you have the original source you can probably
> > correct the linkend instead.
> >
> > Also, I know that this is produced from SGML; is that source available
> > as it would be a darn sight easier to hack on than these sources, plus I
> > could then see what was originally meant by these dangling "See "
> > references - there was another one of these in the proc(1M) manpage some
> > time ago and I suspect it might be the same cause.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/docs-discuss/attachments/20070514/5c17fed3/attachment.bin>
