Astrid Keßler wrote:
- Some line break in the generated output would make the code much
  easier to read. This is only interesting for us during generation
  development.

This is because indent is turned off in the xslt. With indent on, some
very funny things happen with spacing which can have bad effects on the
resulting display. I sugest a quick run through htmltidy (with the non-indent features turned off) if you want to actually read the stuff.



- I agree with Patrik to use <th> for table header cells.

Question: <th> stands for Table Header. Can Row titles really be considered "headers" (they aren't at the head of the table)? This is purely a symantic issue.



- The table columns (e.g. in http://cvs.apache.org/~slive/manual/install.html under overview for the impatient, or at the module pages) should have a little bit more horizontal distance.

Sure. I don't mind using CSS to increase the default cellpadding a little. I'd also like to slightly increase the vertical space before <dt> entires, because we use that quite a bit to seperate sub-headings.



This is a doom loop. If nobody sets such links, no one will use them. If no one use them, nobody sets them. I think, we should set them, because it is just a small sentence.

And personally: I will use them. I do not like the fixed width of nds
stylesheet. The alternate styles were created based on an discussion
between him an me. They are a possibility to support views for every
liking.

OK. But lets get a primary version done first, and then we can play as much as we want with alternate stylesheets.


I don't like the big red hover color. It is to eye-catching for me. I
often move the mouse over the document, while reading. The red color
distracts me. The missing difference between module link colors and
directive link colors is a pity. But other links shouldn't be red, whil
using the red hoover color.
I would prefer the colors suggested from nd, bu I can live with yours
too, espacially, if we use alternate styles ;-)

I believe there needs to be a single characteristic that says "this is a clickable link" for mouse-hovers. The point of red is to catch the eye so people know that they can get further info. Andre's latest version uses "underline" for the hover. Personally, I find that this breaks my concentration more than the color change, but I can live with it if it is consistent.


Thanks again for the feedback.

Joshua.


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to