* Tim Gerundt wrote:
I have a little suggestion for "/docs-2.0/mod/index.xml". In the documentation you use this "red" links for module links. I think at the module overview you should use this style, too.
folks, just wanna say, that Tim and me have already discussed that before. I suggested him to ask on the list.
My opinion is to stick with the current variant, because I think the red highlighting breaks the flow a bit - but I'm unsure.
Would be nice, if someone could say something; it would only be a small patch.
nd
I don't like this idea. To get it really consistent we would also have to use the same font (courier, <code>) and that definitely wouldn't fit in there. Also the semantics are not the same: in continuous text the module-color/-font has the effect of highlighting the different link-types (directive, modules, ...) and to make it easier to differentiate them. In the module overview we have a list with different modules (headlines), nothing more; there is no need to differentiate.
Apart from this i'm +1 on using red-/courier-links in the continuous text which follows the headlines (see obsolete modules).
just my 2 cents ;-)
erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
