On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andr� Malo wrote: > Hmm. If we consider the sitemap containing references to all files, it > should contain that link, too. For example, in the CHM toc, I think, it > would be still useful.
A philisophical question: is a sitemap a list of all "files" or a list of all "content"? I don't know, but I think I favor the latter. > This problem should be gone anyway, if/when we automate the FAQ category > entries. Then we would do something similar to the modules (a &faq; entity > or so) and every transformation can do with this, what it wants. What do you > think? Sure. I'm having a hard time imagining exactly what this will look like, but it sounds like the right direction. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
