* Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andr� Malo wrote:
>> Hmm. If we consider the sitemap containing references to all files, it
>> should contain that link, too. For example, in the CHM toc, I think, it
>> would be still useful.
>
> A philisophical question: is a sitemap a list of all "files" or a list of
> all "content"? I don't know, but I think I favor the latter.
philosophical - may be. Technical - we need one document that maintains a
list of all files for transformation and autogeneration purposes. The
sitemap doesn't seem to be the worst choice ;-)
>> This problem should be gone anyway, if/when we automate the FAQ category
>> entries. Then we would do something similar to the modules (a &faq; entity
>> or so) and every transformation can do with this, what it wants. What do you
>> think?
>
> Sure. I'm having a hard time imagining exactly what this will look like,
> but it sounds like the right direction.
Once I have more time, I'll take it (if nobody else does).
nd
--
Gefunden auf einer "Webdesigner"-Seite:
> Programmierung in HTML, XML, WML, CGI, FLASH <
# Andr� Malo # http://www.perlig.de/ #
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
