* Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Andr� Malo wrote: > > And display an automatic warning in front (or at the bottom?) of the > > document? Sounds good. We could add that information to the metafiles > > (since they are already perl-generated). > > > > I see just one minor problem: The task depends heavily on cvs in path > > and an online connection. So the way would be to run it just from time > > to time and update the info periodically (manually). It should not be > > triggered automatically on a building box. I could live with that > > limitation. Thoughts? > > Yes, my opinion is that the basic ./build.sh should be kept as lean as > possible. The more complicated parts of the build can be run by people > who have the time and tools.
After I've slept over it, I think we can lower the hurdle a bit, if we make use of CVS keyword expansion for the English files ($Revision$) (and later $LastChangedRevision$ of svn). That would remove the dependency of cvs, but would add these numbers to the files. How does this sound? nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
