Yoshiki wrote: > Andr� Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Wouldn't this be better using real xml fields, which we could then >>> transform in the docs so that readers of translations would know if they >>> were reading the most recent version? >> >> Well, BTDT. >> Here's a suggestion: >> >> http://www.apache.org/~nd/manual/ru/new_features_2_0.html >> >> The message needs to be translated, of course. >> Opinions? > I think it would be nicer if the revision numbers are in it, > like: Original revision: 1.3 Translated revision: 1.1 > Many people probably have no clue what revision number means > but it will give you a rough idea of how out of date the > translation is. I don't think so. As Joshua said, revision numbers are for developers only. Users might misinterpret them with release numbers. And if I understand the discussion right, the revision numbers are stored in the xml file. This well for developers. Kess --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
