> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> pquerna 2004/11/06 22:01:50 >> >> Added: docs/manual new_features_2_2.html >> new_features_2_2.html.en >> new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta >> Log: >> First Swing at a 2.0 -> 2.2 New Features Document. > > As long as we just have 2.1, wouldn't it be better to have a > new_features_2_1 > document? We use the 2.1 version number all over the docs. > (and I don't see 2.2 tomorrow ;)
IMHO, no. 2.1 will never be a 'public' release by our versioning definition. Only 2.2 will be something that we'd recommend to the general public. 2.1 could only be at best beta. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
