* "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> pquerna 2004/11/06 22:01:50 > >> > >> Added: docs/manual new_features_2_2.html > >> new_features_2_2.html.en > >> new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta > >> Log: > >> First Swing at a 2.0 -> 2.2 New Features Document. > > > > As long as we just have 2.1, wouldn't it be better to have a > > new_features_2_1 > > document? We use the 2.1 version number all over the docs. > > (and I don't see 2.2 tomorrow ;) > > IMHO, no. 2.1 will never be a 'public' release by our versioning > definition. Only 2.2 will be something that we'd recommend to the general > public. 2.1 could only be at best beta. -- justin
Well, but it's still the 2.1 branch with 2.1 docs (docs-2.1/). And, of course, once tagged and released (as alpha, beta, whatever) it *is* public. Though not stable. That's a difference :) nd -- >>> Muschelflucht-Zusatzeinrichtung. >> Shell-Escape ist ja noch klar, aber `Zusatzeinrichtung'? > extension? Feature. -- gefunden in de.org.ccc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
