Andr� Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Yoshiki Hayashi wrote: > >> I think it puts too much burden on documentation writers. I >> mildly protested to the current way of putting out of date >> warning on all outdated translations no matter what. > > Oh? I must have overlooked that. But to be clear, it's not to blame the > translators. It's meant as a help for the user.
Here, I meant writers of original English documentation. There aren't as many contributor to documentation from development team as is. I don't think it is a very good idea to tax origanal documentation contributor for the sake of translations. But... > yep. We could even add priorities to the documents (only two, "important" > and "normal"). Important would be, say, the frontpage and perhaps a few > others. An update of an important English page would invalidate the > translation, a normal page would get a warning (like the docs). ... If the main purpose is just to invalidate the translation in case of really important change, I guess that's fine by me. -- Yoshiki Hayashi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
