Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Joshua Slive wrote:

Shall we revisit this and try to come up with a solution that isn't
dependent on http?

Sure. Drop the docs from the default tarball and point people to our many more-useful formats (web, ms-help, pdf, etc).


I assume you're joking.  Someone who needs the documentation, and who
can't access it online because they downloaded the software to be
installed offline, is going to feel warm and fuzzy when it finds
out that not only is there no documentation in the tarball, but it
has to go back online and choose a format of docco to be downloaded
and installed separately.

Who are we writing this docco for?  Ourselves?  Or for people who
need it?  Are we formatting it to make it easier for us to maintain,
or for them to use?

The idea is not to prevent people from downloading the docs. The idea is to give them a *choice* at the time of download of the doc format that will work best for them, rather than giving everyone the same format. Yes, this means that some people will need to download two things instead of one, but it also means that they'll get stuff more appropriate to their needs.


There are other choices. We could revert to single-language docs, we could do some complicated install procedure to get people the language they want, or we could try to split the different languages into different directories in such a way as to make them offline-browsable. None of those are particularly easy or clean, and they all preclude allowing the downloader to choose the appropriate format in advance.

Joshua.


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to