On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:03:27 -0800, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 1:53 PM -0500 Jeff Trawick > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm guessing that somebody forgot the snafu in cvs where 1.3 docs were > > separate from 1.3 code, resulting in the 1.3 docs being accidentally > > omitted from svn. > > Partially right: the 1.3 docs weren't separate at one point, so they have > overlapping branch info with the 1.3 code. Furthermore, the 2.0 docs were > *copied* from the RCS files. (The httpd-2.0 code repository was a clean > import rather than a copy.) So, the 2.0 docs had the same branch info for > everything up until the 1.3/2.0 branch point. Hence, you can't import both > of them cleanly. > > About every single mistake possible with copying in CVS is illustrated in > the httpd-docs-1.3 module. Sigh. > > > Personally I have no idea how to get the 1.3 docs into the 1.3 svn > > branch and maintain old revision history. > > Doable, but it's a significant amount of effort. The two easiest solutions > would be: 1) abandon the docs entirely (see Rich's post),
ouch > or 2) ditch the > history (they will be available with CVS) and just import the latest docs > into the 1.3 branch. works for me --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
