-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: | --On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 1:53 PM -0500 Jeff Trawick | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |> I'm guessing that somebody forgot the snafu in cvs where 1.3 docs were |> separate from 1.3 code, resulting in the 1.3 docs being accidentally |> omitted from svn. | | | Partially right: the 1.3 docs weren't separate at one point, so they | have overlapping branch info with the 1.3 code. Furthermore, the 2.0 | docs were *copied* from the RCS files. (The httpd-2.0 code repository | was a clean import rather than a copy.) So, the 2.0 docs had the same | branch info for everything up until the 1.3/2.0 branch point. Hence, | you can't import both of them cleanly. | | About every single mistake possible with copying in CVS is illustrated | in the httpd-docs-1.3 module. Sigh. | |> Personally I have no idea how to get the 1.3 docs into the 1.3 svn |> branch and maintain old revision history. | | | Doable, but it's a significant amount of effort. The two easiest | solutions would be: 1) abandon the docs entirely (see Rich's post), or | 2) ditch the history (they will be available with CVS) and just import | the latest docs into the 1.3 branch. -- justin
I don't see any particular problem with losing the docs history. It's not nearly as important in the docs as it is elsewhere.
- -- When we are young, wandering the face of the earth, wondering what our dreams might be worth, learning that we're only immortal for a limited time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB3GFpXP03+sx4yJMRAlojAJ9oxs55pn5DkYYWbKN5Jwf1cb1JkgCgx/+q gidoBoI6aU9R8Fn1FUzEPlA= =RUqA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
