On 6/29/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> I understand your reasoning, but I'd prefer not. I don't think there
> are enough doc bugs to justify another list. As an alternative, we
Currently that are about 5% of all bugs (just used my link below with
and without component value). And the reason to create a new list is
actually because there is a comparable *low* number of documentation
bugs such that at least some httpd-docs people do not have enough time
to go through the bugs@ list. OTH I think 5% is enough such that we
should increase visibility.
Furthermore at least I would adjust the component of bugs more often to
documentation if I would know that this makes this more visible to docs
people. This is not a plain try to offload work, but a matter of
priorities and to make things visible to people whose focus is more on
this particular topic.
I don't have a strong objection to a separate list. I would prefer
that the mails continue to go to the main list as well. I don't want
docs bugs to become a getto.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
