Folks,What would you consider Best Practice when one svn ups the manual tree, touches one file, builds and then finds a bunch of generated files changed because of an XML source change inherited from the svn up?
1) Commit inadvertedly changed generated files with ones own change? 2) Commit own change, its generated files, and then commit inadvertedly changed generated files under separate cover? 3) Commit just ones own change and its generated files? 4) Commit just ones own change and leave it to someone else to generate the HTML? Enlightment appreciated. S. (Abort, Retry, Ignore?) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
