On 02/23/2007 07:50 AM, Mads Toftum wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:16:25PM -0500, Sander Temme wrote: > >>1) Commit inadvertedly changed generated files with ones own change? > > > Not the best way - it gets a bit messy that way. > > >>2) Commit own change, its generated files, and then commit inadvertedly >> changed generated files under separate cover? > > > I think that would be the preferred option. > > >>3) Commit just ones own change and its generated files? > > > That's ok too if you're unsure about what else is being picked up or > worried that there might be an error in it. > > >>4) Commit just ones own change and leave it to someone else to generate >> the HTML? >> > > That does happen at times when people have trouble generating the html, > but with Andre not going through and picking up everyone elses mess as > often as he used to, that isn't fabulous.
I think there might be a fifth option: Commit your own changes to xml Commit the generated files in a second step For me building the generated files is some sort of compiling and personally I never check the changes done by such commits. Just my 0.02 cents. BTW: Even if the generated files only contain changes caused by my own changes to the xml files I used to commit the changes to the generated files as a separate commit, following my first one containing only the xml changes. Is this ok or do people prefer if I commit them in one step in the future? Regards Rüdiger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
