On 5/25/07, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24/05/07, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the specific case at hand, I have one major thing to contribute:
> The whole Common_HTTPStatusCodes page is redundant in my opinion. It
> duplicates (with a lot less information) the content of the HTTP spec.
> In fact, I plan to delete this page unless I hear objections on this
> list.
+1 (I'm not a committer, but this is the wiki so I guess I can vote.)
I don't see any merit in this page over the standard and the source.
I started that page, it was never my intend to cover the full RFC,
Just the most common codes for a quick reference. (as was reflected in the url)
A link to the RFC with the full spec would ofcource be usefull for
people who want more informatiom.
Personally i was very happy with the form it had on revision 7.
If you remove it thats fine but I'd rather see it go back to revision 7.
--
~Jorge
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
