On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:45 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/17/2010 6:37 AM, Rich Bowen wrote
Summary:
It appears that the majority is in favor of 'Apache HTTP Server' when
referred to in full, but there doesn't seem to be much of a
consensus of
how this should be abbreviated, so that we don't have to say the full
name every time.
Example sentences:
In deciding what file to serve for a given request, httpd's
default behavior is to take the URL-Path for the request (the part
of the URL following the hostname and port) and add it to the end
of the <directive module="core">DocumentRoot</directive> specified
in your configuration files.
I don't find this ambiguous. Let's choose a worse one
...
Ok. Well, as long as we can refer to the product as "Apache HTTP
Server", I think that the other cases in which we desire an
abbreviated form are individually pretty easy. It just requires
someone to read all the docs and get the sense of the paragraph in
question. Not difficult, just tedious. I didn't think that the patch
would incur the wrath of Roy.
--Rich
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
