On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:01:25 +0200 > Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 01.10.2010 17:18, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > * Is it even worthwhile to have a FAQ? I think it probably is, but what > > > I mean is, is it useful to have this as a monolithic static document, > or > > > should we be doing something else here? > > > > I think it is worthwhile. We do now have Wikis available, which are an > > interesting alternative for producing FAQ type content. Maybe once can > > include an export of the wiki when doing a release and add links to > > increase chances of users contributing to the Wiki? > > On reading DrBacchus's post, my immediate reaction was to say > bin the FAQ and point to the wiki instead. That improves the chances > of it being maintained, rather than getting ever more out-of-date > until someone finally gets around to it. > > Insofar as there's material in the FAQ that's worth keeping alive, > maybe export it to the wiki. > > I was also thinking that we shouldn't need a FAQ if the doc is good, but maybe it would make sense as a set of links to the doc.
How does fajita know where to refer people? Maybe some of that knowledge could be applied to create a new FAQ-like document. -- Dan Poirier <[email protected]>
