On 27 May 2012, at 23:20, Daniel Gruno wrote: > - When this moves to 2.4 and possibly 2.2, should we keep each branch > separate, or should we unify it? That is, should f.x. core.html show the same > comments for 2.2, 2.4 and trunk combined, or should they be kept separate? > > I'm leaning towards the latter myself, as a lot of pages really have changed > quite a bit, and it'd become confusing if someone is suddenly commenting on a > 2.2 issue and it shows up in the 2.4 docs.
I like the idea of keeping them separate. For each new branch, it would be nice to have a way for someone to bring over a filtered set of the existing comments that are still relevant. I think that would actually get used — it's a task you can do without knowing much about how the httpd project works. -- Tim Bannister – is...@jellybaby.net
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
