On 5/29/2012 4:04 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 29 May 2012, at 8:50 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >>> Each branch different, 2.2 & 2.4 have some big differences between >>> them in various areas. My 2 cents anyway. >> What I'm perhaps more curious to get sorted out is whether we should >> consider the trunk and the 2.4 documentation separate entities, or >> whether they should be linked, comment-wise. Currently, they are pretty >> much identical, but in the future it may be a good idea to keep them >> separate as we move towards 2.5/2.6. > > My gut feel is that trunk shouldn't have comments at all - trunk is fluid, > and changes without warning. Comments are very likely to get stale and become > more of a problem than a help.
I think we should keep them, all. That said, I think they need to be most recent first, and it would be really cool to fade them from black to very light gray over time unless they are voted up as 'useful info' within the most recent year. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
