-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14. juni 2015 02:11, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hi Lucien,
> 
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Lucien Gentis 
> <lucien.gen...@univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> Since we use Unicode in XML files, do we still need to replace
>> accentuated characters like é or è by HTML entities ?
> 
> Not doing so would require each committer to take care of having 
> her/his system's locale or editor configured in UTF8. I'm not
> saying I'm against the idea, it would certainly ease writing docs
> in non-english language, but just want to be clear about this (if 
> I'm not mistaken).

Would it be my little patch in [1] that spurred this question?

Having written the patch I'm sure you understand my position on the
issue. Just saying that which ever way this is decided, it should be
consistent. The current state is everything but.

There are 3 benefits to doing this as I see:
* Easier reading
* Easier writing
* Fewer transfered bytes in eg. error pages (This is minimal I know,
I'm sure someone would like to point out that this is negligible, and
it probably is).

In a well configured versioning system, there are mostly patches, and
not whole rewrites of code/documentation. Any parts left alone would
not be touched by most editors I know. So the diffs would only be for
the parts unaffected by the non ASCII characters.

Without any knowledge about the state of the different parts of the
world, I would speculate that for non Latin-1 language users, there
would be high pressure to convert to UTF, medium pressure for Latin-1
language users (my group), and little pressure for pure ASCII users.

Meaning that those who would edit those parts of the files would
already be converted, and those not editing those parts of the files
would not affect them.

- -Tom Fredrik

[1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57878
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=92yk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org

Reply via email to