On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Luis Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1 April 2016 at 17:50, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So I would simply s/2.2/2.4/ to update the "recommended" version, but >> the possibility to use another branch is already mentioned. > > So better put 2.2/2.4? or just the 2.4 since 2.2 its not maintained?
2.4 alone is enough IMHO, though 2.2 may still be maintained ;) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
