On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:04 AM Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 26/07/2018 à 02:51, cove...@apache.org a écrit : > > Author: covener > Date: Thu Jul 26 00:51:41 2018 > New Revision: 1836684 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1836684&view=rev > Log: > xforms > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en > > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en?rev=1836684&r1=1836683&r2=1836684&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html.en Thu Jul 26 00:51:41 > 2018 > @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ > -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > -<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC > "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; lang="en" xml:lang="en"><head> > <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type" /> > <!-- > > Are you using an unpatched version of xalan.jar? > The one provided in docs-build is patched to add a new-line before <!DOCTYPE>
just out of date maybe? Nothing intentional. > > I don't know why it has been tweaked this way. Only a cosmetic issue? > Personally I would +1 the use of the unpatched version of xalan, and +1 a > change 2.7.2 to use the latest version available. Changes between 2.7.1 and > 2.7.2 are really limited and looks like small optimizations only. > > At least, every one that build the docs should use a consistent framework or > we will keep doing/undoing this kind of modification. Good catch. I think I tinkered with trying to disable it and left it in my sandbox. > I know that 'comments' has been down for a while now (really sad, it is a > really nice source of comment/feedback from our users), but is it done on > purpose (i.e. style="visibility: hidden;")? Good catch, this is an uncommited XSL change. I don't think it even did the right thing. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
