Hi, When we released first alpha of Doctrine 2 we didn't have the concept of EXTRA_LAZY, which was introduced around 2.2. Related to BC, we need to keep it, even tough you may not realize it is a BC break, it is. There are multiple ways were this would generate a BC break, such as ClassMetadata checks. It wouldn't be any overhead to switch them; the problem still resides in BC. We could discuss about doing this for 2.5, but I doubt everyone would agree to move as we strongly keep BC.
Cheers, On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Piro Fabio <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all. > > Just out of curiosity... why the EXTRA-LAZY option is'nt the default for > relation? BC should be fine, so.... how much overhead is involved? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "doctrine-user" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: [email protected] GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "doctrine-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
