Thanks for the clear reply. it should be added to the manual, maybe. Il giorno martedì 25 febbraio 2014 14:53:40 UTC+1, Guilherme Blanco ha scritto: > > Hi, > > When we released first alpha of Doctrine 2 we didn't have the concept of > EXTRA_LAZY, which was introduced around 2.2. > Related to BC, we need to keep it, even tough you may not realize it is a > BC break, it is. There are multiple ways were this would generate a BC > break, such as ClassMetadata checks. > It wouldn't be any overhead to switch them; the problem still resides in > BC. We could discuss about doing this for 2.5, but I doubt everyone would > agree to move as we strongly keep BC. > > Cheers, > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Piro Fabio <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Just out of curiosity... why the EXTRA-LAZY option is'nt the default for >> relation? BC should be fine, so.... how much overhead is involved? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "doctrine-user" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > Guilherme Blanco > MSN: [email protected] <javascript:> > GTalk: guilhermeblanco > Toronto - ON/Canada >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "doctrine-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
