> IMO for the first release of LibO, ideally we would have PDFs and
> printed books available, as well as info on the wiki. Started from the
> ODTs is the fastest way to do all of that. For future releases, the
> method could be quite different.
>
> --Jean
Thanks Jean for bringing out this perspective.
Yes, I agree: If the Libo docs are adopted from the well-formed docs of OOo,
then there is no point in wikifying.
And I doubt if we will need any additional documents (because OOo already had a
full set, from where we are starting off).
Well, that's valid only the current version: If Libo is to be "extensively
re-written for contents, and not features", we may need new docs.
Then using a wiki makes sense for a fresh document.
******
Another important thing to note: All of us agreed that OOo cannot easily export
an odt file to wiki.
Does it not strike you as a valid development target for LiBo?
LiBo should excel in this area; because wiki (and web in general) will touch
many more lives in future!
What is a software if it cannot resolve the pain points of its own help authors?
Please pass on the word to Charles Schulz! :)
-Narayan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
