Hi, :-) On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:16, Jean Weber <jeanwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMO the first thing needed for the LibO docs is REVIEWING (to see that > the content is accurate), after which comes editing (which is probably > what everyone erroneously calls "proofreading"). > > Sigrid would be excellent at REVIEWING; that is, spotting what needs > to be changed from the OOo docs to turn them into LibO docs, since she > is very familiar with OOo. I suspect that is what she has in mind to > do. > > Actually, from working with Sigrid over the past 6? longer? years, I > can say that she will do an excellent job regardless of how she > chooses to contribute. :-) Including, perhaps, writing up some of the > LibO features that are not part of OOo... though that might not > require separate chapters, but rather additional sections in existing > chapters.
OK, guys, do what you think. ;-) It's your time, so use it the way you want. ;-) (David mutters, "Damned cats!") David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
