2011/1/16 Tom Davies <[email protected]> > Hi :) > > I have checked just for spellings not even a grammar check. > 1. Changed a couple of titles to Title Case rather than normal sentence. > 2. Should <br> be <br />? I didn't change it. > 3. There was a subsection covering Debian & Ubuntu that had a "su" command. > Presumably Debian doesn't have "sudo" but Ubuntu does. So, i split that > sub-section into 2 sub-sections; one for Debian and another for Ubuntu. If > Debian does use sudo then the 2 sub-sections could be recombined. Later on > a > subsection for Debian & Ubuntu does use "sudo" for both distros. >
Debian has sudo, but it must be configured, but it's ok to let sudo for Debian based distros. People will know what to do... > 4. Is Suse correct? I thought their name was now openSUSE > http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=suse > So, i changed all to openSUSE. > This is the part David has to tell us for what exact distro he wrote the initial install instructions, I tested them in openSUSE 11.3 > 5. 1 instance of libreoffice changed to LibreOffice because it was not in a > url > or command-line command or other code, just a tpyo i think. > 6. Can the source-code tarballs be used in Hurd distros aswell as Linux > ones? > Can they be used in BSD OSes? Is the plural of Linux = Linuxes, Linii, > Linices > or distros? The term 'Distros' may be changing slightly to include other > unix-based platforms. > Now this is waaaaaayyyyy more geek than I can relate to, someone knows if we can build the LibreOffice in other kernels? 7. i changed "dropdown" to "drop-down" > 8. Titles shouldn't have <br> at the end right? > 9. QuickStarter looked fine as it's camel-case and seems to be a name of > something? > 10. I changed a title from > "Un-Installing a Previous Version of LibreOffice" to just "Un-Installing > LibreOffice" to make the section more useful. Added a line to say that > un-installing previous versions is a smart plan. > 11. I think "deselect" should be changed to "de-select" but i left it as it > was. It was consistent through the document so i guessed it might widely > used > in the rest of documentation in which case it is better to stay consistent > for a > little niggle like this. > For me it is indiferent, even changing the term if something other seems more precise. > > I thought i had proof-read this document before as many of the errors were > tiny > issues that i had corrected somewhere before. These things take a lot less > time > 2nd time around so i am not worried about that but it does worry me that i > might > have followed a wrong work-flow and stuffed something up for someone else? > For > a wiki i should just click on the "Edit" tab at the top, do the changes, > add a > summary of the changes made and click on "Save Page" at the bottom? > You could just add something like "reviewed the spelling" ;) Thanks anyway for this Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
