On 7/5/2011 5:30 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 02:16, Gary Schnabl<[email protected]> wrote:
The OOo/LO template exposition concerning the contributor names included the
advice to use Shit+Enter (similar to<br /> in XHTML) as a forced line break
between names, so that question of the original poster need not have been
made--assuming that the instructions in the template exposition were
followed.
People reviewing chapters in the user guides probably won't have read
the exposition in the template, because they will have had no reason
to open the template and discover that there is useful information
there.
When you have finished revising the expostion, we can copy it into a
planned chapter of the Contributors' Guide. That way people are more
likely to discover and read the information.
--Jean
I have not read nor edited most of the resource material.
Perhaps, it would help if the reviewers were advised to submit their
reviewed copy on the latest template copy, which contains useful
exposition. Especially if the review covers the entire document.
The document properties might help with determining if the latest,
most-current template was employed for the particular document being
reviewed or technically edited.
Gary
--
Gary Schnabl
Southwest Detroit, two miles NORTH! of Canada--Windsor, that is...
Technical Editor forum <http://TechnicalEditor.LivernoisYard.com/phpBB3/>
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
