I don't remember who is dealing with that page, or what happened (or not) with the doc you wrote. I have a vague (and possibly incorrect) memory that this was on David Nelson's to-do list. I've been popping in and out of the project, so I haven't kept up as well as I sometimes do. But I don't think your doc is being deliberately hidden, though it may well have been mislaid.
And I have no idea who edited it badly. Perhaps that is why it's still hidden, awaiting someone to clean it up. --Jean On 08/12/2011, at 10:07, Rogerio Luz Coelho <luz.roge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok good to know, just to clarify, the document that is in Alfresco (and > wich needs some polishing again) was not used in that page? > > Well ... at least it is there in Alfresco (although it was awfully edited > with some parts of some other document added) > > If it pleases the team I would be willing to give it another reshaping, but > I won't if it will be kept a secret as it is currently :) > > No problem ... I wrote those instructions for the wiki and for myself, but > I have little time to spare, so if it will not be used anywhere, I preffer > to spend my time in other endeavors. > > I'll await your input > > Rogerio > > PS: @Peter, good to see you did it, but if we were to debug the problem we > should have some more info ... but forget that for now and on to your work > :) > > 2011/12/6 Peter Schofield <psaut...@gmail.com> > >> Hello Rogerio >> >> I installed Ubuntu 11.10 as a second OS on my toshiba laptop. The standard >> Ubuntu installation includes LibreOffice, but not the Base program. So, I >> re-installed LibreOffice from the Ubuntu Software Center to make sure Base >> was installed. However, the Galaxy set was not installed and only the Human >> set was available for icons. >> >> I downloaded the Linux Debian version from the LibreOffice website and the >> went to http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation/linux/ for the >> installation instructions. Everything went OK using Terminal until I >> reached Step 4. When I ran the dpkg command again for desktop-integration, >> a conflict error message appeared. I cannot remember the message and the >> dpkg command completed. I then checked LibreOffice and found that the >> Galaxy set had not installed. So I used Synaptic to install the Galaxy set >> without any problems. >> >> Regards >> >> Peter >> >> >> On 6 Dec 2011, at 01:41, Rogerio Luz Coelho wrote: >> >>> @ Peter and Gabriel: >>> >>> I wrote the instructions for Linux install a while back ... so please: >>> >>> 1) Where exactly did you follow instructions >>> >>> 2) what is exactly the error you see >>> >>> Thx >>> >>> Rogerio >>> >>> 2011/12/5 Peter Schofield <psaut...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> Hello Jean >>>> >>>> Just tried installing LO into Ubuntu 11.10 following the instructions on >>>> the LO website - download the DEB package from LO website, unarchive and >>>> use Terminal. The Galaxy set does not install and using Terminal >> produces a >>>> conflict error. Solution was to use Synaptic and install the Galaxy >> set. I >>>> definitely now have Galaxy set as default. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5 Dec 2011, at 09:31, Jean Weber wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 17:35, <i...@mjfox.ch> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean >>>>>> not sure if I have it correctly but: >>>>>> >>>>>> In Ubuntu 11.10 you have to install the additional >> libreoffice-style-XXX >>>>>> packages if you use the default install of Libreoffice. >>>>>> >>>>>> Choices for XXX are hicontrast, human, crystal, oxygen, tango and >> galaxy >>>>>> - 6 separate packages to install. If you do not install these, you do >>>>>> not see the options for the various icon sets in the Options dialog of >>>>>> LO. >>>>>> >>>>>> hth >>>>>> Martin >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Martin, I am sure you are right. <looks around /> Aha! They are in >>>>> Synaptic package manager. Why didn't I think of that? (Probably >>>>> because I'm using a Mac these days. How quickly I forget Ubuntu >>>>> things!) >>>>> >>>>> So that is another way for Gabriel and others to get the Galaxy icon >>>>> set. I still think it's best to install LO from the LO website, to >>>>> avoid any other differences that may exist in the distro versions of >>>>> LO. >>>>> >>>>> --Jean >>>>> -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
