On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jean Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll take a closer look at media.LO.org. Two questions: > 1) Can it be set to show only published files to people who are not logged in? > 2) how would that work for your preferred method not changing filenames for > different LO versions? Seems to me this is an argument for different > filenames.
1) Yes. Although some would argue that, in the name of project openness, all content stored on Alfresco should be visible. But the answer to your question is that it's easy to use permissions only to showcase stuff you consider to be published and world-ready. 2) I don't quite understand the question here. But understanding versioning systems was confusing at first, for me. But, once one takes the concepts on-board and uses them in association with file meta data, it falls into place. The only question is this: does one work more effectively with a manual system that is intrinsically "less efficient" from a geeky viewpoint but that is easier for non-geeks to understand and lets them get work done today rather than in 2 months time after RTFM? Again, it's a choice to be made. -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
