The Docs blog could be used for a variety of purposes, and it does appear in the TDF/LO planet. One thing I'd like us to do is share tips and short how-tos (can be pointers to others' work), which IMO don't really fit on the Marketing blog. --Jean
On 22/02/2013, at 4:40, Tom <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi :) > Seems i sent the iirc thread off-topic so here is the original thread about > the marketing team potentially doing (weekly?) interviews to post up on > their blog. > > I was trying to be humorous in my first post in this thread and it totally > failed so i've just kinda edited out my nonsense from the quote below. > Sadly i couldn't edit the subject-line so we could probably do with a new > thread about blogs. > > I think it's in the nature of people drawn to documentation that they might > not be keen to blog or advertise frequently so it might be better to use the > marketing team's blog to get your message out there. As theirs will have a > wider variety of topics and have a faster, more frequent turn-around it's > likely that more people would read it regularly. > Apols and regards from > Tom :) > > > > > Tom wrote >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Marc Paré < > >> marc@ > >> > >>> To: > >> [email protected] > >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2013, 9:42 >>> Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: (unknown) >>> >>> Le 2013-02-12 06:36, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit : >>>> Italo, all, >>>> >>>> I have about three interviews that are ready to be published from devs >>>> and localizers. I can starto to publish them as of today but if you have >>>> a better timing in mind please let me know. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Charles. >>> >>> Seeing as you are having more success at this than I was, one suggestion > is to keep going with our blog dev interviews. IMO, we get more exposure > from this if we can keep posting one to two per week. If you approach the > devs and can manage a steady stream of finished interviews, I can help with > scheduling them for posting along a regular time cycle. We have > approximately 500 devs. >>> >>> For example we could designate the "Wednesday" and "Friday" as a days of > dev interview posts. >>> >>> Maybe someone from the QA team (suggestions of Sophie/Joel) could approach > the QA team members and take care of the interviews and I could also do the > same for QA blog posts. We could for example designate "Thursdays" as QA > interview blog posts. >>> >>> I could take care of the Website team interviews and we could designate > "Tuesdays" as Website interview blog-posts. >>> >>> That would leave Design (VI,UX) and Docs, l10n and perhaps do some for nl > group leads. We could also do or dare to include the Discussion team in this > as well and pick out certain individuals whose contributions to that > particular team is considered of high standard of participation. >>> >>> This would make our blog even more attractive to read and for media > dissemination. Having predictable days where certain interviews are done for > certain groups, makes it appealing for those who are interested in specific > groups. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Marc > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Regular-interviews-tp4037044p4039406.html > Sent from the Documentation mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
