My 94 Intrepid had the 3.3 and I loved the whiney turbine sound it made on acceleration. When it was totalled by a hit and run driver in a stolen car, I replaced it with a 95 Intrepid ES with the 3.5 which was more powerful, but wasn't as smooth. Seemed to growl and rumble on hard acceleration. But a great engine, nonetheless.
I also had a 94 Caravan with the 3.3 which was rated at less horsepower. Smooth runner! Trouble was, the 3.3 had been around a LONG time already, and was old technology. 2 valves, instead of 4, per cylinder. Pushrods, instead of overhead cam. Etc. Not to mention gas mileage was never good on the 3.3 I have the 2.7 in my Sebring Convertible, and get great mileage with awesome power. Other than that, It's just my opinion. I truly do not know why Chrysler ditched the 3.3 Isn't it still in Caravans and Voyagers? Craig C, > Web: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dodge_intrepid> Subscribe: <mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Moderator: <mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dodge_intrepid/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dodge_intrepid/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
