If Diamond aircraft won't respond, I guess the next question is why do we have 
to deal with them anyway regarding the 3000 hour inspection?
We have the list of things that have to be done...why not just do all the work, 
sign it out and start flying again?
Rob

PO Box 129,

Lawson, NSW, 2783.

mobile 0429 493828







































.............................................

--- On Sun, 27/5/12, Ian Mc Phee <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Ian Mc Phee <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] Diamond Aircraft tech support contact detalails 
needed
To: [email protected]
Received: Sunday, 27 May, 2012, 6:14 PM

We had no response to about 4 emails except May 1 (europe holiday) and response 
was "out of office" and finally a response from Hawker Pacific and $1000 + GST 
which is double the original price and they did not respond to parts like fuel 
pump etc.  

It would be good if Bernard were the agent again as gather he gives good 
service.  Think he was helpful with Nigel's wing

Ian M
27 May 2012 17:33, John C <[email protected]> wrote:






Hi Rob,
 
They won't deal direct anymore - only via Hawker 
Pacific.
Just costs more and takes longer.
 
John.
 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: 
  Rob 
  Thompson 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 1:17 PM
  Subject: [DOG mailing list] Diamond 
  Aircraft tech support contact detalails needed
  

  
    
    
      I just went to Diamond Aircraft's website and no email 
        addresses.
Anyone know a contact I can deal with about the 3000 hour 
        inspection?
Rob
PO Box 129,
Lawson, NSW, 2783.
mobile 0429 
        493828



















.............................................

--- 
        On Sat, 26/5/12, John Viney <[email protected]> 
        wrote:

        
From: 
          John Viney <[email protected]>
Subject: 
          Re: [DOG mailing list] nuts on rear of front plate in 3 position 
          hoffmann/MT prop
To: [email protected]
Received: 
          Saturday, 26 May, 2012, 2:47 AM


          
          

          
          Hi Ian,
           
          Min amount of material required around the 
          hole varies with type of material and loading it 
          experiences (aluminium and cast iron need more than 
          mild steel & High carbon steels need even less, but you are 
          right and in the Hoffmann thrust ring less than hole dia x 1 is not 
          good design. 
           
          Nylock nuts in reverse for the inner nuts on 
          the Hoffmann pitch change rods would be an acceptable fix,  
          but on pushrod ends is not the best answer as it will stay 
          locked to the rod thread but the nut face can still loosen 
          against the rod.  Best method is a double tab washer which 
          locks one tab against a flat on the pushrod ( not on all rods, you 
may 
          have to file one)  and another tab 
          against the nut.  Some rod ends have a groove in the thread for a 
          locktab with an internal tang, again one tab against the flat on 
          the rod & another against the nut. 
           
          Re; supplies of FC332  see my earlier 
          e-mail.  I am happy to purchase & post to any owner 
          who has trouble obtaining FC332-4, -6 & -8 hose, also correct 
          size Oetiker clamps.  Type 154 (single ear stainless steel with 
          liner) for hose attachment, and type 101 (2 ear zinc coated steel) 
for 
          securing firesleeving.
           
          regards
          JGV 
          
            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Ian 
            Mc Phee 
            To: DOG 
            LIST 
            Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:55 
            PM
            Subject: [DOG mailing list] 
            nuts on rear of front plate in 3 position hoffmann/MT prop
            
A friend with a Ximango has 
            had the inside nuts (non locking) coming loose and been talking to 
            Eric Weston he has replaced them with nylon lock nuts put on in 
            reverse so now they really lock on the prop front plate. 
            

            I am not impressed how the hole size is increased in plate from 
            6mm to 8mm (for the 8mm rods) BUT the plate is made no longer. 
             I seem to remember somewhere in engineering there should be 
            beef of 1.5 times the diameter of the hole on the outside of the 
            hole ie 12mm.  No way it is about 6 or 7 mm from memory. Don't 
            these makers have any engineers working for them any more or look 
at 
            what they post on EASA site when they decide to issue a 
            SB?    

            

            As some know motor PIKs have had the locking nuts coming loose 
            on ball rod ends in the wing which can cause ball rod ends to crack 
            and break  (It happened to our PIK E 15 yrs ago)  Anyhow a 
            friend with a PIK replaced all the ordinary 6mm nuts with nylon 
            locking nuts and screwed them on in reverse so now 
            they positively lock the ball rod end to push rod.
            

            Both seem like a good idea to me to solve a problem which the 
            makers never thought of. 
            

            I am not at all impressed with the service provided by the so 
            called Diamond agent in Aus Hawker Pacific.  Took guess 6 
            emails to Austria and only on May 1 (Europe Public Holiday) did I 
            get several "out of office" emails so Austria were getting them. 
             Eventually Australia  replied but no mention of the 
            various spares I asked prices of.  Not impressed compared to 4 
            years ago I got a phone call from Austria 30 seconds after I 
pressed 
            the send button on an email.  That was the then Canadian 
            speaking Parts Manager. in Austria.  S   L   A   
            C   K  if you ask me
            

            Finally does anybody know where to buy Aeroquip AC 332-4 (or 
            -6) blue fuel hose as my source in Brisbane no longer stock same. 
             Has anybody used the aviation Aeroquip AE-466-4 etc hose 
             The main advantage of this hose is it has red cover of 
            fireproofing on the hose at manufacture but is expensive I 
            guess..
            

            Ian McPhee
            (PS I suppose I am just a grump)
            

             


Reply via email to