Looks like your first post got through anyway (I have a full inbox so I didn't notice before) and the bundle seems intact. Right?
/Anders Anders Logg wrote: > What does the mailing list tell you about the reason for rejecting the > bundle? > > /Anders > > > Jed Brown wrote: >> Aaaack. The list scrubbed the bundle. The manual says to `hg bundle' >> and send to the list. Either the list prefs should be changed or the >> manual should be changed to say `hg export'. Here's a link to the >> bundle: >> >> http://59A2.org/fenics/dolfin-jed-20070919.hg >> >> changeset: 3382:a435372e25e5 >> tag: tip >> user: Jed Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> date: Wed Sep 19 14:28:10 2007 +0200 >> summary: Do not rely on implicit injection of friend declarations into >> namespace. >> >> According to the GCC man page: >> >> -ffriend-injection >> Inject friend functions into the enclosing namespace, so that >> they are visible >> outside the scope of the class in which they are declared. >> Friend functions were >> documented to work this way in the old Annotated C++ Reference >> Manual, and ver‐ >> sions of G++ before 4.1 always worked that way. However, in ISO >> C++ a friend >> function which is not declared in an enclosing scope can only be >> found using argu‐ >> ment dependent lookup. This option causes friends to be injected >> as they were in >> earlier releases. >> >> This option is for compatibility, and may be removed in a future >> release of G++. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
